<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
 <!-- Generated by Ektron CMS400.NET -->
 <channel>
  <title>Welcome to IDSA Practice Guideline Discussion Forums : IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis</title>
  <link>http://www.idsociety.org/discussion.aspx?g=topics&amp;f=32212256345&amp;groupid=-1</link>
  <description></description>
 <item>
  <title>IDSA Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis in Children and Adults</title>
  <link>http://www.idsociety.org/discussion.aspx?g=posts&amp;t=32212263169</link>
  <description><![CDATA[1 Replies, 2536 Views<br />Started by Jeanna Ray<br />Last Posted to on Friday, December 28, 2012 11:04:05 AM by JoelFishbain<br />I agree with your comments. A couple of concerns that I have is the antibiotic options.  amox/clav is fine but many insurance companies including medicaid still won't cover it.  Also to discount cephalosporins (weak, moderate recommendation) and go right to respiratory quinolones seems a bit agressive and as with amox/clav problems with coverage.  If the CAP guidelines from 2007 have not changed for S. pneumo coverage then why the change for ABRS?  I think the doxy is a nice option  for cost and insurance related issues but I would need to review our antibiogram for activity in the current time period against the most common bacterial pathogens.  I would like to see this algorithm reviewed but I agree with you still quite a lack of good scientific data andlimitations with diagnosis.
]]></description>
  <pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:04:05 GMT</pubDate>
 </item>
 </channel>
</rss>
